Skip to main content

The Problem with LLM Trading

Most AI trading systems face a fundamental problem: context acquisition. When an LLM needs to make trading decisions, it typically:
  1. Searches the web for information
  2. Parses unstructured text
  3. Extracts entities and relationships
  4. Hopes it didn’t hallucinate
This is slow, unreliable, and error-prone.

Market Motion Solution

One API call gives your AI agent everything it needs—structured, typed, attributed data.

Architecture Pattern

1

Entity Discovery

Use search or categories to find relevant entities
2

Context Retrieval

Fetch entity details with relationships and market exposures
3

Signal Detection

Monitor attribute changes that signal trading opportunities
4

Market Mapping

Identify which markets are affected by entity changes
5

Trade Execution

Execute trades on Polymarket/Kalshi directly

Example: Sports Betting Agent

Example: Political Event Agent

Prompt Engineering with Entity Context

When using LLMs for trading decisions, inject entity context:

Best Practices

Entity attributes don’t change every second. Cache for 5-15 minutes to reduce API calls and latency.
Depth 1 is usually enough. Depth 2-3 for complex relationship analysis. More depth = more data to process.
Every attribute includes a source. Use this to weight confidence in your trading decisions.
Use Market Motion for context and discovery. Execute trades directly on venue APIs for speed.

LLM Context File

For AI systems that need comprehensive API documentation, use our machine-readable context file:
This contains all endpoints, schemas, and examples in a format optimized for LLM consumption.